A test of trade theories when expenditure is home biased
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
When is Trade Protection Good for Growth ?
The empirical relationship between trade protection and economic growth is surprisingly fragile, as shown in a number of other papers. After demonstrating this empirical sensitivity, we address one possible explanation for these findings: that the relationship is nonlinear. Following the endogenous growth literature, we test for the possibility that the relationship between trade barriers and g...
متن کاملSustainability Test of Iran’s Agricultural Balance Trade
From the perspective of new growth models and new international trade theories, both exports and imports play an important role in a dynamic economy. Economically, we cannot merely emphasize on a positive trade balance and we ignore the benefits of imports, and also we cannot advise negative trade balance. But the main concern of policy makers about international trade should be making stabilit...
متن کاملTest: when is enough enough?
The focus of this panel is the trade-off between excessive testing and acceptable shipped quality levels. How much testing is enough? We all strive to ship our customers high quality product, or at least product that meets our customers’ quality expectations. Often improvements in shipped quality levels can be made by plugging obvious holes in a device’s test suite, sometimes simply by increasi...
متن کاملWhen every $P$-flat ideal is flat
In this paper, we study the class of rings in which every $P$-flat ideal is flat and which will be called $PFF$-rings. In particular, Von Neumann regular rings, hereditary rings, semi-hereditary ring, PID and arithmetical rings are examples of $PFF$-rings. In the context domain, this notion coincide with Pr"{u}fer domain. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: European Economic Review
سال: 2009
ISSN: 0014-2921
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.03.003